Growth Marketing Glossary

App Rating

app rat·ingnoun

The number under the icon. An app rating is the average star score users award your app, a headline ASO signal that sways both store ranking and the decision to install.

user star ratingsratings lift ASOapp store visibility
Schematic — user star ratings feeding store visibility and installs
Term
App rating
Is
Average star score from users
Where
App Store and Google Play
Signals
App store optimization (ASO), install intent

Parts of speech & senses

app rating · noun
  1. An app rating is the average star score, usually out of five, that users give an app in the App Store or Google Play, a key app store optimization signal that shapes ranking and downloads. "A run of bugs dragged their app rating below four stars."

What an app rating is

An app rating is the star score users assign an app in a mobile app store, almost always on a one-to-five scale, shown on the store as an average alongside the number of ratings behind it. Both Apple's App Store and Google Play collect ratings and display the average prominently on the app's page and in search results, often right beside the icon. A rating is a quick, numeric verdict — a tap on three, four, or five stars — and it is deliberately lighter than a written review, which pairs a rating with text. Because it takes almost no effort, far more people leave a rating than write a review, so the average rating is the broadest read on how satisfied an app's users are, distilled into a single figure the store puts front and center.

The app rating carries weight far beyond vanity because it sits at the center of app store optimization, the practice of improving an app's visibility and appeal in the stores. Ratings influence how the store ranks an app in search and browse, and they shape the split-second decision to install: shown two similar apps, most people pick the one with the higher star average and the fuller reviews. A strong rating compounds — better ranking brings more downloads, and more satisfied downloads bring more good ratings — while a slide below the four-star line can quietly throttle installs even when nothing else about the app changed. The rating is therefore both a mirror of user satisfaction and a lever on growth, which is why teams watch it closely.

App rating versus review and ranking

An app rating is often lumped together with reviews and store ranking, but the three are separate things. A rating is the number — the star score and its average. A review is the number plus written feedback, where a user explains what they liked or hated. Ratings give you breadth, since most people who tap stars never write a word; reviews give you depth, telling you why the score is what it is. Reading them together is the point: a falling average rating tells you something is wrong, and the reviews tell you what. Treating the rating as the whole story throws away the diagnosis; treating a handful of vocal reviews as the whole story ignores the quiet majority the average captures.

Ranking is different again. An app's ranking is its position in store search results and category charts, and the rating is only one of several inputs into it — alongside download velocity, retention, keyword relevance, and engagement. A high rating helps a ranking but does not guarantee one, and a well-ranked app is not automatically well-rated. The useful mental model is a chain: a strong app earns good ratings, good ratings and downloads lift ranking, and better ranking drives more installs. Confusing rating with ranking leads teams to obsess over the star number while neglecting the retention and engagement that also move position. Keeping rating, review, and ranking distinct lets you see which lever a given problem actually sits on.

Improving an app rating well

Improving an app rating well starts with the product, because ratings are a symptom and the app is the cause: fix crashes and slow screens, smooth the first-run experience, and ship the features users keep asking for. Then ask for ratings at the right moment — after someone completes a satisfying action, not the instant they open the app or in the middle of a task — and use the platforms' native rating prompts, which keep the request inside the store's rules. Respond to reviews, especially critical ones, since a thoughtful public reply can turn a one-star complaint into a revised, higher score and shows prospective users that the team listens. Watch the rating over time and around releases, so a dip after an update is caught and addressed before it drags the average down.

The failures tend to be manipulative or careless. Gating the app behind a rating prompt, nagging repeatedly, or pushing users to rate before they have experienced any value annoys people and breaches store policies, which can bring penalties. Trying to buy or fake ratings risks removal from the store outright. Chasing the star number while ignoring the reviews that explain it treats the symptom and leaves the disease. And letting a bad release sit unmonitored lets a wave of low ratings pile up before anyone notices. The discipline is to earn ratings by deserving them — a reliable, valuable app, honest prompts at good moments, genuine engagement with reviews, and close attention to the trend — so the average reflects real satisfaction rather than pressure or trickery.

Worked example. A productivity app shipped an update that quietly broke sync on some devices, and within days its App Store rating slid from comfortably above four stars toward the danger zone, with new reviews all citing lost data. Because the team watched the rating around releases, they caught the slide fast, rolled out a fix, and replied to each affected reviewer explaining what happened. Many updated their star score once sync was restored, and the average recovered. The lesson: an app rating is a live signal of satisfaction and a lever on app store optimization, so the way to protect it is a reliable product plus honest prompts and quick response — never pressure or fakery. (Illustrative; RGM analysis.)
Failure modes to watch. Gating the app behind rating prompts or nagging users, which breaks store rules; buying or faking ratings and risking removal; chasing the star number while ignoring the reviews that explain it; and leaving a bad release unmonitored while low ratings pile up.

Synonyms & antonyms

Synonyms

star ratingapp store ratinguser rating

Antonyms

written reviewapp ranking

Origin & history

An app rating — the average star score users give an app in the App Store or Google Play — is a headline app store optimization signal, distinct from written reviews and from store ranking.

Etymology: source.

Usage trends

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Common questions

What is an app rating?
The average star score, usually out of five, that users give an app in the App Store or Google Play. It is shown beside the app and is a key app store optimization signal that influences both store ranking and the decision to install.
How is a rating different from a review?
A rating is just the star number; a review adds written feedback. Most people rate without writing, so ratings give breadth while reviews give depth. Read together, the rating flags a problem and the reviews explain what it is.
How do you raise an app rating without breaking store rules?
Fix the product first, then ask for ratings at a satisfying moment using the platform's native prompt, and reply to reviews. Never gate the app behind a prompt, nag repeatedly, or buy ratings, since those breach policy and risk penalties.

Resources & people to follow

Curated, non-competitor resources verified per term.

Related training

Disciplines

Areas of marketing where app rating is a core concern:

Sources

  1. trendsGoogle Trends — "app rating"