Growth Marketing Glossary

Domain Authority (DA)

D·Anoun

A useful rumor about ranking power — Moz's score, comparative by design, and not a number Google has ever used.

DA62/100Moz's scorepredicts ranking strengthfrom the link profilecomparative, not Google'sa third-party proxy for ranking power
Schematic — the third-party proxy score
Term
Domain Authority (DA)
By
Moz — with Ahrefs DR as the sibling
Predicts
Ranking strength from links
Is not
A Google metric or a target

Forms & parts of speech

DA · noun
Moz's link-strength proxy.
"The prospect list filtered at DA 50+ - a proxy threshold, useful exactly as long as nobody mistook it for Google."

Definition in plain terms

Domain Authority (DA) is Moz's 1-100 score predicting how well a domain is likely to rank, computed from its link profile — referring domains, link quality, link patterns — against the rest of the web. Ahrefs' Domain Rating (DR) is the sibling metric most teams use interchangeably. Two facts anchor honest use: the scores are comparative (logarithmic scales where 20→30 is easy and 70→80 is mountainous, meaningful mainly against competitors), and they are third-party proxies — Google has repeatedly said it uses no 'domain authority' metric, whatever the rumor mill insists.

The mechanics

The mechanics explain the limits. Moz and Ahrefs crawl the web, index links, and model what link equity tends to produce in rankings — machine-learned correlation with real SERPs, refreshed as the web and the model change (Moz's DA 2.0 update in 2019 re-scored swaths of the web overnight, a reminder the number is a model's opinion, not a property of the site). The legitimate uses are triage and trend: filtering DIGITAL-PR and LINK-BUILDING prospect lists (a DA-8 directory and a DA-78 newspaper deserve different effort), benchmarking authority growth against competitors over quarters, and sanity-checking a domain's league before content investment — the same job BACKLINK profile review does in detail. The abuses are where the metric earns its bad name: DA as a KPI invites Goodhart's law (the score is gameable with links Google would discount or punish, so chasing it optimizes the proxy and not the ranking); cross-tool comparisons confuse models (DA and DR disagree by design); absolute thresholds ignore category reality (DA 35 leads some niches); and 'guaranteed DA 50+ guest posts' is the spam economy's favorite invoice line. The discipline is proxy posture: use it to sort and trend, verify with real rankings and traffic, and never let a vendor's model become the goal.

When it matters

DA matters as a working shorthand wherever link sources get triaged at volume — PR prospecting, competitive authority benchmarks, due diligence on domains. It matters most when held lightly: trends against competitors mean something; the absolute number means little; and any strategy that 'targets DA' has confused the speedometer with the road. The discipline is to report it beside the metrics that pay — rankings, organic traffic, referring-domain growth — and to keep the office honest about whose number it is.

Worked example. An SEO lead inherits a quarterly report whose headline KPI is 'grow DA from 42 to 50' - and a link vendor invoicing against exactly that promise. The audit tells the proxy story: DA rose four points over the year while organic traffic fell 12%, because the vendor's directory-and-guest-post links inflated the model and impressed Google not at all. The rebuild repositions the metric: DA/DR stays as a prospect-triage filter (editorial targets sorted into effort tiers) and a competitive trend line (the brand against five rivals, quarterly), while the KPIs revert to what pays - rankings on money terms, organic revenue, referring-domain growth from coverage-grade sources. The digital-PR program replaces the vendor; eighteen months later DA has risen three points as a side effect, and nobody in the building mistakes the speedometer for the road anymore.
Failure modes to watch. DA as a KPI inviting exactly the links Google discounts; cross-tool score comparisons confusing different models; absolute thresholds ignoring that DA 35 leads some categories; 'guaranteed DA 50 placements' purchased as if the number transferred; and reports headlining the proxy while rankings and revenue go unmentioned.

Synonyms & antonyms

Synonyms

Domain AuthorityDAdomain rating (sibling metric)

Antonyms

PageRank (Google's own)ranking performance

Origin & history

Moz introduced Domain Authority in the late 2000s as a PageRank-era proxy for link strength, and rebuilt it as DA 2.0 in 2019 with machine-learned scoring; Ahrefs' Domain Rating became the parallel currency, and both outlived Google's visible PageRank to become the industry's shared — and chronically misread — shorthand for authority.

Etymology: source.

Usage trends

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Common questions

What is Domain Authority?
Moz's 1-100 score predicting a domain's ranking strength from its link profile — comparative, logarithmic, and a third-party model rather than anything Google uses.
Is Domain Authority a Google ranking factor?
No — Google has repeatedly said it uses no domain-authority metric; DA and Ahrefs' DR are vendor models correlating link profiles with ranking outcomes.
How should DA be used?
As triage and trend — filtering link prospects, benchmarking authority against competitors over time — verified against real rankings and traffic, never as a KPI in itself.

Related tools & calculators

Resources & people to follow

Curated, non-competitor resources verified per term.

Related training

Disciplines

Areas of marketing where domain authority (da) is a core concern:

Sources

  1. trendsGoogle Trends — "domain authority"